Pages

Tuesday, 23 March 2010

Balanced article on Pope Benedict

John Hooper has written a lengthy article for today's Guardian about Pope Benedict. Entitled Is the pope a reactionary or a prophet, it gives a fair-minded and balanced assessment of Pope Benedict. It is by no means a hagiography and I wouldn't agree with everything he says, but it is a relief to read something from a commenter in the secular press who knows what he is talking about. John Hooper has done us a service with this objective appraisal which is a welcome contrast to the Catholic baiting of the Times.

(I picked up the link for the article from Morning Catholic must-reads which is a regular round-up written by Luke Coppen, Editor of the Catholic Herald. His blog Editor's Briefing is well worth following.)

7 comments:

Crux Fidelis said...

The assertion (more than likely a sub-editor's) that Benedict XVI is the "most controversial pontiff in history" is somewhat hyperbolic.

Dominic Mary said...

What a splendid article : someone who knows his job, and has done his homework. Deo Gratias !

Londiniensis said...

Yes, I read it this morning and tweeted it as a "not unsympathetic, but distanced, Guardian's-eye view". Certainly it is a better outsider's approach than the rather hysterical pieces in The Times recently.

Duca di Salina said...

by Guardian standards, this might be balanced, but otherwise, it is just the usual liberal stereotypes.

Frugal Dougal said...

It's good to see a balanced article on the Pope, free from the hysteria that appears to have infested some publications and bloggers.

Besides which, somebody who is unafraid to offend people is a good'un in my books. And I liked the bit about the cats.

JARay said...

I rather liked the letter written by Cardinal Pell in today's The Australian.
JARay

pilligrimin said...

The Guardian article was very surprising indeed, and it is testimony to a surprising man. Personally, I still do not know quite what to make of him, but I remember the moment when I first came across his 2003 speech to the Pontifical Biblical Commission on the occasion of their centenary, when he discussed the relationship between the Magisterium and exegetes.

Here, I think you will see a wonderful balance between the radical Ratzinger of Vatican II and - much later - the more conservative man who was soon to become the Holy Father.

I have to admit, as a reflective critic of the traditionalist wing of the Church, and an unashamed returner from the Catholic Church to the Anglican fold, that I nevertheless believe that the jury is out on Benedict XVI. Popes mature with age and with the the guidance of the Holy Spirit, who always does surprising things. Look at John XXIII and what happened there! (Whoops... sorry, bad example for this blog.)

There are many in the Anglican communion who appreciate Benedict very much, as I have discovered on my return to this curious fold, and that is very interesting. So perhaps it is not entirely surprising that (even) the Guardian can publish an appreciative article like this. It is not so much testimony to the honesty of the journalist, although that is praiseworthy, but more to the honest appeal of his subject.

Personally, like many, I discovered a more balanced approach by discovering Benedict's own words, and I re-read that speech to the Pontifical Biblical Commission many times. I looked at it again yesterday. The whole 20th century is in there, and in a sense, you can see how that century influenced him as a man; and that prepared him to see the way that - as Pope - he understands God is guiding us.

www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/pcb_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20030510_ratzinger-comm-bible_en.html

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...